Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Walter's avatar

My response to the City:

"Background

I have lived in Sebastopol (city) since 1999 and until several years ago I walked everywhere (bank, drug store, library, Ives Park, etc).

Comments

Several "starters": 1) Next to pedestrian safety (and decreasing vehicle exhaust emissions), the primary concern when evaluating this realignment proposal should be the financial health of Sebastopol City government. And Sebastopol's financial health will be improved principally through increased sales and occupancy tax receipts. 2) I believe the general public "concern" with Sebastopol traffic flow is, deep down, really a concern about the quality and "sprightliness" of Sebastopol retail stores. People want Sebastopol to be a little more like Healdsburg instead of the tattoo parlors, nail salons, pizza parlors, and vacancies we seem to be specializing in.

With these "starters" in mind 1) I believe the City should do as little as possible to change the existing traffic flow. I think the worst thing that could be done would be to turn Main St. into two way. Can you imagine the delays that would be caused by cars waiting on Main St (heading south) to turn left (east) onto Sebastopol Ave. (route 12 toward Santa Rosa) if we had 2 instead of three lanes going south on Main? 2) I believe if the City or State want to improve pedestrian crossings (I think the new pedestrian crossing light to be installed on S. Main at Burnett is great), have at it. But a consideration should be maintenance costs (who is going to pay for watering and weeding the "planters"?) 3) I am all for more bicycle travel in the City. But I have seen little, if any, increase in bicycle use with the new bicycle lanes - particularly the lane on Petaluma Ave. (Under the rubric of "improving traffic flow" the City or State should delete the bicycle lanes on Petaluma Ave. and add another lane for cars - the reasons for which I am sure you have heard many, many times)."

Ted Luthin's avatar

The goal of this study is to improve the quality of Main Street and downtown, not improve traffic flow. The one way system was introduced to maximize the flow of cars through town. By doing that, we lost a lot of the character of our small town, trading people space for three lanes or cars on Main Street and turning South Main into a drag strip. This is our chance to reclaim downtown for people with wider sidewalks, crosswalks, bulbous and more room for bikes and street trees. The question we should be asking is; which option makes downtown the best for people, not which option benefits people driving through town the most. If a wonderful downtown means that people driving through Sebastopol are delayed a few minutes, I think that’s a fair trade. And for reference, the difference in travel time through town during rush hour and mid-day is only about 5 minutes.

I am in favor of all two-way streets but am disappointed to see that the consultant didn’t include that as an option. Two-way streets provide so many more route options than we currently have and having more options will improve flow. The consultant’s traffic studies from earlier work concluded that a two-way street grid would actually IMPROVE flow, not reduce it. Win-Win!

20 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?