Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nancy Hair's avatar

I'm speechless that the Elderberry management is suggesting that those who are not violating lease terms, doing/selling drugs, turning tricks, or otherwise breaking the law should be the ones to leave 'if they aren't happy'. This is outrageous. Are we supposed to just get used to dysfunctional 'management' that supports the rule breakers, not the abiders? And I truly don't understand why homeless people get to choose to live, supported, in Sebastopol or West County when most of the employed people who live here can barely afford it and often have to move to the outer reaches of the county and put up with miserable commutes. As a former 'Lib', I have less sympathy for most of the homeless than for the working poor.

Expand full comment
American Nation's avatar

I worked with the homeless for 30 years. Providing them housing doesn’t help them in the long term. They don’t have the living skills to sustain a residence, and they aren’t interested in learning living skills, unless/until you can motivate them to become interested in personal change.

The County (I worked in AODS, Mental Health and the jail for years) mostly hires godless Liberals who have no idea how significant personal change is initiated. No Jesus, no significant personal change. Know Jesus, know significant personal change. It’s that simple.

That’s why food pantries rarely see their clients go away; it’s not really about helping others. Liberals (Narcissists) just want to feel good about themselves. That’s why they feed the homeless. Underneath it all, they know that if their clients actually change, they (Libs who feed the homeless) won’t have their “Helper” identity anymore.

Truth is hard when you’re living a hidden agenda. Elderberry Commons doesn’t change lives; it provides temporary housing - that’s all.

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts