Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kent Jenkins's avatar

Last night I proudly watched this community and a functioning democracy in action: An organized forum, the thoughtful airing of a problem, a lot of informed public comments, and a pragmatic discussion among public officials.

I agree with the “press rules” outcome. Like many others, I rely on the Sebastopol Times for what’s happening in and around the city. Most importantly, it is the way I learn about what the local government is good at, and what might be missing from its agenda.

However, I left the meeting unsatisfied. Why? Why did the Mayor feel the need to put forth a more restrictive press procedure?

I respect Mayor Zollman and our city officials. They have broad responsibilities and limited budgets. Mayor Zollman is an experienced public service lawyer. Lawyers know the Constitutional problems with limiting Free Speech and Freedom of the Press. And, no Constitutional right means “anything goes.” Speech can be moderated in “time, place, and manner” if there is a compelling government interest at stake, like public safety.

Did Mayor Zollman have a compelling reason to take the approved Council policy and construe it in a more restrictive way? We don’t know if his reason was compelling or not. It wasn’t discussed. We don’t know if those draft procedures were simply a momentary lapse of judgement, an overreaction to something that happened, or an ongoing problem that the Mayor feels he can’t talk about. Yes, the immediate problem was solved, but there is an important question left unanswered.

Expand full comment
Jean Farmer's avatar

Thank you Laura for bringing this to all of our attention. I am so grateful for your work and everyone who works on the Sebastopol Times. The Times has become such an imporatant part of our community. And, last night shows that we, as citizens can have a strong impact on outcomes at the local level.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts