Feels like being there with a smart narrator whispering in my ear. Each time I attend or hear about these meetings, I'm struck that despite the breadth and talent of people involved, the administrative format and process seem opaque and Byzantine.
Phill Carter is reported as saying that some of the items should have been moved from the consent to the regular agenda, if so, why didn't he speak up at the meeting?
Feels like being there with a smart narrator whispering in my ear. Each time I attend or hear about these meetings, I'm struck that despite the breadth and talent of people involved, the administrative format and process seem opaque and Byzantine.
Phill Carter is reported as saying that some of the items should have been moved from the consent to the regular agenda, if so, why didn't he speak up at the meeting?