Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Aaron Rosen's avatar

Sounds like a great hotel to facilitate more visitors to spend more money..., but, is that what we want? We live here because it is a beautiful place to live. Many of us came from larger, more densely populated areas. Yet, here we go making it more like the places we escaped from. When noise, pollution, traffic and rents increase, where will we go next? Where is the next place we will ruin? It seems, to me at least, that the human race allows greed to rule and common sense to disappear.

Expand full comment
Slartibartfast42's avatar

Lowest initial cost or building sophistication for the future: The Barlow owns the land beneath their property and could put parking in multi levels instead of horizontal on the surface. Even cut-and-cover with a park above. Why always the cheap and easy?

The surface area used for parking would be lost as a future location for business that could bring revenue to Sebastopol. The city would be subsidizing The Barlow by that lost revenue.

The same idea applies to the city owned land used for parking by Hopmonk. Put parking beneath revenue generation or park beautification.

Another thought, it takes money to make money, so the saying goes, and like poor people with fewer choices, our poverty stricken village (that sort of wants to be a town) aims at cheapest initial cost seemingly on all choices. Is long term thinking an unaffordable luxury? Think BIGGER.

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts