Why couldn’t the students be part of the actual discussion of these new rules? To me, it shows a lack of trust. Certainly there should be limits on use of cell phones during classes, but the need for prohibiting them “bell-to-bell” is unjustified. The fact that many students were unaware of the discussions is indicative of the secrecy of the discussions, not their “addiction” to cell phones.
From my perspective the fact that they don’t agree reflects that they are still students, many of whom don’t seem to read the articles about the ongoing litigation about all this. Addiction clearly comes in lots of flavors.
Why couldn’t the students be part of the actual discussion of these new rules? To me, it shows a lack of trust. Certainly there should be limits on use of cell phones during classes, but the need for prohibiting them “bell-to-bell” is unjustified. The fact that many students were unaware of the discussions is indicative of the secrecy of the discussions, not their “addiction” to cell phones.
Let the opinions roll, as we read this article on our devices
I went to school before cell phones and the school would call my mother if needed.
From my perspective the fact that they don’t agree reflects that they are still students, many of whom don’t seem to read the articles about the ongoing litigation about all this. Addiction clearly comes in lots of flavors.